Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Catholic Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per Kappa! Seriously though, it's unverifiable per Uncle G.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:40, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Grace Catholic Church
Delete. Non-notable, micro-denomination. What links one can work out from an attempt at verifiability through Google mostly seem to be Wikipedia mirrors. If this church has made a splash, it doesn't seem anyone's talking about it. &mdash;Preost talk  contribs  22:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. While it is a relatively small church, it appears notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 22:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Any chance of some evidence? Kappa 23:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster. Plus it seems to be a real denomination, and the article is npov as far as I can see Jcuk 23:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Being real doesn't make it notable. My bathroom is real.  It doesn't get a Wikipedia article without some press or scholarly coverage. &mdash;Preost  talk  contribs  23:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * How have you determined that it is real? The only evidence presented by the article is a web site.  "Having a web site" does not equate to "real".  Jamie Kane has a web site.  The only evidence locatable elsewhere is Alexis Tancibok being described as being a bishop of the Grace Catholic Church, where evidently he himself is the source of that information.  Alexis Tancibok's word by itself is insufficient. Uncle G 20:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of it being verified or having a large following.Gateman1997 00:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if this is true. However, it may be a hoax. Should be verified. -- JJay 00:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Then please help in doing so. Uncle G 20:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no time. But keep me informed of your progress. Thanks. -- JJay 21:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of being an established denomination. Hopefully someone will find something to change my mind. Kappa 02:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This purported denomination has no mention in Addis &amp; Arnold's, no mention in the Catholic Encyclopaedia, and no detectable presence apart from a web site and incidental mention in coverage of the activities of Alexis Tancibok. I can find no evidence that anyone outside of its founder(s) has acknowledged its existence.  The article itself cites no sources.  Delete. Uncle G 20:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.