Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Clawson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  03:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Grace Clawson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced stub article on a very old person. Notability asserted, but not demonstrated by substantive coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:BIO. Most of the article's content relates not to the subject herself, but to unsourced speculation about her position on lists of very old people. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep see &#39;&#39;&#91;&#91;User:Kitia&#124;Kitia&#93;&#93;&#39;&#39; (talk) 13:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply That 393-word article devotes 20 words to Clawson, which is trivial coverage. Please Kitia, do read WP:BIO. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable as per WP:BIO. - Gallo glass  14:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge No substantial independent, reliable sources to establish meeting WP:N or WP:BIO. Nothing here that couldn't be summarized in the many supercentenarian lists. Cheers, CP 16:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even close to meeting WP:BIO. -- Web H amster  17:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.