Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Kingston McLeod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Pigman ☿ 19:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Grace Kingston McLeod

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article does not meet WP:FICT. The guideline states "fictional concepts can be presumed notable if they have received significant real-world coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" this article does not meet this. For similar case see Articles for deletion/Brad Armstrong (Home and Away) and all the other fictonal character pages that were deleted as they wern't considered notable}} Printer222 (talk) 13:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons as above, they are fictonal characters that aren't notable in the real world and they don't meet WP:FICT.

The discussion for these articles can take place here.


 * Delete - As the nom said they all fail WP:FICT so I can see no reason not to delete them all. --Mifter (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I See no reason to delete Regan McLeod, Tess Silverman McLeod Ryan & Rob Shelton/Matt Bosnich as they all have information in it but Meg Fountain Dodge & Grace Kingston McLeod only really have an info box so those 2 would be the one's to delete if you do. -- McLeod Fan 2001 - 2008 17.28, 24 March 2008
 * Delete; no significant real-world coverage. Having information in them or not is not relevant in this case. --Geniac (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:FICT. No assertion of real-world significance. Eusebeus (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.