Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Pavilion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sonoma County Fairgrounds. It looks as though the most relevant information has already been merged, so all that's left is to redirect this article there. Deor (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Grace Pavilion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've spent time looking for reliable secondary sources that cover Grace Pavilion substantially, I can't find any. I feel that this specific building, despite it's fabulous architecture, fails GNG - I can see it perhaps being mentioned in the county fair article (when it's created). SarahStierch (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * How about a merge to Sonoma County Fairgrounds? --MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Ha! Funny, I created that article right after I posted this, and totally spaced mentioning it. I'll close this discussion and open a merge suggestion. Thanks User:MelanieN :) SarahStierch (talk) 15:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I know that if I post a merge request it'll never get looked at there. Now that it's here, if we can agree to merge (and I sort of already have, using an image of it) then this can be closed and merge can take place without hoping someone will notice on the Grace talk page. :) SarahStierch (talk) 15:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, on the basis that it's already very briefly mentioned in the Sonoma County Fairgrounds article. Anything more than that would be undue, considering no-on has identified a single independent source that covers the Center in any detail. Sionk (talk) 17:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.