Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gradeup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Gradeup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not satisfy product notability or general notability and reads like an advertisement. The references are not third-party, but are in the nature of published press releases or advertorials, and Google search turns up nothing written independently, only the usual vanity hits. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This article is shown as having been accepted via Articles for Creation. However, it was reviewed properly through AFC once and declined.  It was then moved from draft space to article space by a paid editor, not by an AFC reviewer.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - I just saw this at AfC as it was a pending draft in the article space. Taking a look at the references, the article lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. There are many references, but they are from unreliable sources or simply state general announcements about the company.
 * Delete - fails N - it's a prep test which may have significance for those about to take a test. Not seeing the required RS that make this one particularly notable over any other. Atsme 📞📧 19:50, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - Author has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom SeraphWiki (talk) 06:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MT TrainDiscuss 12:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.