Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grae Worster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Snow. University of Cambridge Prof. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Grae Worster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entry appears to be a short-form curriculum vitae, there is no evidence of notability nor references from reliable sources to support any notability. User:HopsonRoad 02:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  02:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  02:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:PROF with a GS h-index of 42 and WP:PROF as a Fellow of the APS. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Along with #C1 and #C3 already established, he passes WP:PROF as editor-in-chief of a major journal. Any one of these would be enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. JFM is the leading journal in its field. Its editor is notable per se by PROF. He clearly passes several other categories in PROF. Please just close this. Agricola44 (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close. Article is short but that's wikipedia's own fault; he easily passes several of the notability criteria. 128.223.223.134 (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject seems to meet notability. The article undoubtedly needs work, but that is not a reason for deletion. Dunarc (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep While I would like to see this article better developed, his being Editor-in-Chief of a major journal is enough on its own to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.