Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graft Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Graft Architects

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not as blatant an advertisment as many articles I've seen, but it's still an advertisement. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's self-promotion. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty flagrantly violates WP:NOT. <3 orange bold article name. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 12:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy G11 "Would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic." Fits the bill. RayAYang (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I initially requested CSD G11 on this article, but it was declined. Was quite surprised at that. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 04:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Richardcavell and RayAYang. Purpose seems mainly to promote itself.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 02:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.