Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Diamond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Graham Diamond
Poorly written article about an author, which is likely vanity. Sales ranks for his books at Amazon seem to be well over 1,000,000. Around 900 googles for "Graham Diamond", but many appear to be "Graham-Diamond" (two separate people), no relation. In any case, thats very few for someone who has evidently authored so many books. Not sure if any are vanity presses or not. -R. fiend 04:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * :If the sales rank is over 1 million, surely it should be kept? perhaps with cleanup and/or unverified tags -- Astrokey44 |talk 05:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC) oh never mind, thats a rank, not number of sales isnt it. I'd still say Keep for references such as  -- Astrokey44 |talk 05:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if someone cleans it up. Verifiable author including a series of 4 books .  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-16 06:30Z 
 * comment have cleaned it up somewhat. No idea if he's worth keeping, American authors aint my thing.... Abstain. Jcuk 10:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Prolific author of potboiler fantasy/sf, published by US mass market houses in the 1980s. Monicasdude 15:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Arbustoo 04:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.