Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Eccles, The Jack of Piel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Graham Eccles, The Jack of Piel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Autobiography; gsearch not turning up notability. Can't find book publisher in gsearch; author not listed in any libraries in worldcat. Prod contested without comment by IP editor (who also removed the maintenance templates). Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Authors name brings up no google hits from non-trivial sources relating to the subject; no google book hits on Graham Eccles as a performance poet, as well as no google news coverage. There is simply no information on the subject from verifiable sources, and thus no article can be written to pass notability requirements. Mrathel (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Unverifiable. Hipocrite (talk) 19:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No sources → no article. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing here is verifiable. Also, the thing about juggling, no news outlet would cover such a thing --Genovese12345 (talk) 06:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a very possible hoax, even if the guy has a very nice jugular.Tyrenon (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. Likely not a hoax but certainly reliable sourcing to demonstrate notability is not evident. FWIW most poets would have to have quite a few reliable sources extolling their impact before we'd include them here. -- Banj e  b oi   00:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.