Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Kosakoski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 00:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Graham Kosakoski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet WP:BIO Aerodynex (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep – perhaps meets WP:GNG with at least three articles about him in the newspaper The Kamloops Daily News; I've added the citations just now. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * delete I think he may be notable in his town (Kamloops) but unless we can find sources outside of his local newspaper I would not consider him to be notable enough for a Wikipedia entry.Orasis (talk) 03:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not seeing a strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR here — if you go to the article on Da Vinci's Inquest, the series that's claimed as his most notable role, it doesn't even list him as a "recurring" cast member at all (and IMDb gives him all of three episodes.) So what we have here is an actor who, to date, has only had supporting or guest roles and has not yet graduated to the more prominent roles that would be necessary to meet NACTOR — and a couple of articles in his own hometown newspaper, which aren't enough to confer encyclopedic notability. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he actually meets an inclusion standard, but right now I have to go with the delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.