Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Lee (British musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Graham Lee (British musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines for musicians. The article's single reference is to a quote by the article's subject, which does not establish his notability. Search for additional reliable non-trivial sources turns up nothing else to support such a claim. KDS 4444  Talk  17:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I did find a concert review with a paragraph discussing a piece featuring the subject ("The Independent" 1995 (via Questia, subscription reqd). But that and the passing mention referenced into the article are too little for biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 06:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect somewhere. Given The Independent and Guardian articles, I don't think its worth for this musician to have its own article, but rather merge him into another article having to do with him. 和DITOR  E tails 22:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep -- We have masses of articles on bands of whom I have never heard. I do not see why we should not keep articles on orchestral musicians.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. The solution would be to cull the irrelevant bands, not to water down wikipedia.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.