Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grama Vidiyal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Grama Vidiyal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating again for clearer consensus as I'm still unsure of its solid notability with my own searches finding nothing particlarly outstanding here, here, here, here and here. Pinging the most still active users for comments (unfortunately almost all other editors not active or as active anymore or else I would've pinged them). SwisterTwister  talk  07:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep If it is the larges microfinance organization in India, it's notable. But it would require updating and rewriting.  DGG ( talk ) 09:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - still not seeing much that establishes real notability, and the writing is atrocious. *If* the article is kept, it needs some serious work. Kafka Liz (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, and get input from Wikipedians with more relevant local knowledge (for example, Wikiproject India). I hesitate to delete articles about which I know very little, from a country that speaks English but is on the other side of the planet. — Molly-in-md (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.