Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gramiksha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Gramiksha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find anything in RS sources that would qualify this under WP:GNG or WP:ORG. All web searches are to their own websites, blogs, wordpress, videos, etc. but no good coverage. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent coverage found. As already noted, what I found is just unreliable sources, blogs, wordpress etc. Fails our subject specific notability criteria of WP:NGO, even fails WP:GNG.  Jim Car  ter  20:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of sources and the nature of the article could be a potential scam. The author needs to provide reliable 3rd party sources. SallyDee777 (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lack of reliable and independent sources that provide significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.