Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Alliance of the Sclaveni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Grand Alliance of the Sclaveni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely WP:OR and WP:FRINGE term. The Slavic migrations are historical, but an overarching political structure simply did not exist in any form. This is a pet project of the sockmaster behind this account (see Sockpuppet investigations/Mkd07/Archive), who has repeatedly tried to transform Slavic minor tribal rulers or leaders mentioned in connection with a single event into "kings" of some Macedonian Slavic kingdom or confederation. Constantine  ✍  12:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * REdirect (without merge) to Sclaveni. If its creator has something useful to add on the subject it should be an expansion of that article. This is a horrid article, which we cannot ask the closing admin to try to do anything with.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete because, as Peterkingiron notes, there is not enough useful to worry about merging and the title is the biggest problem with the article. I note that the ODB has two articles: Sklavenoi and Sklavinia to deal with the same topic as our Sclaveni, and does not treat the term "Sklavenoi" as synonymous with "Slavs" the way our article does. Srnec (talk) 17:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The entry simply doesn't make sense and is so poorly written as to be unencyclopedic on that basis alone. DocumentError (talk) 07:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.