Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Fenwick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cabayi (talk) 06:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Grand Fenwick

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Looks to fail GNG. EpicPupper (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Pages 164 to 173 of ISBN 9780198836605, an OUP book, seem fairly in-depth. Uncle G (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Repurpose as Grand Fenwick series and delete the trivia. The novels, the film adaptations, etc. are worth an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the author's article or repurpose as stated above if the series has enough potential as an article. The fictional location itself does not seem to have enough content at this time as a standalone topic. TTN (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has identified a good substantial source above and it is easy to find more such as this and that.  The topic therefore passes WP:GNG and numerous policies indicate that deletion is not appropriate including WP:ATD, WP:NEXIST, WP:NOTPAPER and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I totally agree with KEEP. Four books and two movies surely qualifies as important enough.  We have many articles of lesser themes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:6a01:ad31:7563:1ab1:35be:1251 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * keep per rationale provided by Uncle G. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 19:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.