Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Hyatt Duta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Grand Hyatt Duta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is nothing notable about this planned building and it fails the following requirement per WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Wikiwriter700 (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesses -related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep at 60 stories the building would be a skyscraper and inherently notable. However the notability now is derived from the "Failure to Launch". The hotel is discussed every few years as an abandoned major project, and the latest (2019) is that it may again launch. Lightburst (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - ordinary hotel. I thought only completed skyscrapers were inherently notable. Ping me to convince me. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * leaning delete As it stands, any notability would be notoriety as a failed project. Instead, the citations are all building fansites. Mangoe (talk) 03:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not convinced that there is inherent notability here. The subject fails WP:GNG Spiderone  18:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.