Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Orient du Congo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GRBerry 16:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Grand Orient du Congo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

NN group. Declined speedy. Unsourced article. In searching for sources, Wikipedia is first hit, no other informational hits exist. Therefore, there is simply no way to establish notability. MSJapan (talk) 23:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. A7 fits this like a glove; why was speedy declined?  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Remover stated that any Grand Lodge, by being called such, carries intrinsic notability. MSJapan (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Lies. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per notability Artene50 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable and independent sources to establish notability. Fails verifiability. Edison (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The remover of the speedy was clearly mistaken. It should have been speedied.  You need reliable independant sources to establish notability (See: WP:ORG#Non-commercial organizations).  This article has none. Blueboar (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.