Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Paradi Towers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Grand Paradi Towers

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBUILDING. Other than brief mentions in WP:SENSATIONAL clickbait articles or WP:FRINGE sources like "The Paranormal Guide", there is no indication that this is notable enough for a stand alone article. Delete and redirect to List of reportedly haunted locations in India. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Maharashtra. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk !  14:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:NBUILDING. WP:NBUILDING says that building "may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance" and this building has social importance. NBUILDING also says that "they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability" and this building is deeply covered by WP:RS. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 14:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, but flag it at top for rewriting to make it more encyclopedic from available cleanup templates. Appears to have enough references. The legend is arguably important to the people of India, so WP:WORLDVIEW may also be an encouragement for keeping. I note also that the owners of the buildings have not taken any action to remove negative stories in the media. Perhaps there is a quote from them out there to balance the article.  5Q5 &#124;&#9993; 14:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The problem is not the subject but the way this article is performed. This article subject complies with WP:NBUILDING but it needs to be rewritten accordingly to become neutral and less mystified. --NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is in poor shape currently, but the sources show that WP:GNG is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.