Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Rapids (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Grand Rapids (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NBAND. The only articles I could find are this promotional article and this article more about bands named Grand Rapids. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. Shellwood (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The first link used in the article tells you to download their song and uses the same photo as here, perhaps a copyvio (to be confirmed in a minute). The second website is no longer active, the 3rd and 4th links are basically a blurb about them before certain performances they gave. They appear to have done nothing since 2012ish and likely weren't notable then either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Photo is a copyvio from Spin magazine, tagged as such. This is the 5th photo from an AfD article that's had iffy sourcing or is a clear copyvio this week. argh. Oaktree b (talk) 01:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - This one is actually a close call because they got some media coverage, but it is largely second-hand. Group member Clara Balzary got some press because she has a famous father (e.g. ), but this band is only ever mentioned briefly as one of her short-lived endeavors. Meanwhile, the other three members later formed the more notable QTY (band), and Grand Rapids comes up a lot in coverage of that band, but once again only as a brief historical tidbit. In addition to the Grand Rapids-specific sources in the article, I found this:, but after some initial promotional buzz they accomplished nothing that is relevant for an article here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 19:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.