Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Teft Auto IV Weapons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW. Lenticel ( talk ) 00:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Grand Teft Auto IV Weapons

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Poorly formatted, article name is spelled wrong, content is not encyclopedic. Mblumber (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. Listcruft. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 00:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as A3. No meaningful, substantive content. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 01:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete misnamed, questionable need for split; nothing worth merging. JJL (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as cruft, possible A3. Tavix (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: More like a walkthrough than an encyclopedic article. Anyway, information about the weapons can be included in the article Grand Theft Auto IV itself. Nothing big enough to have an article of its own.  C h a m a l  talk 01:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions.  MuZemike  ( talk ) 02:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  02:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Cruft, don't think it's A3 mind. &mdash; neuro(talk) 03:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - totally useless to wikipedia. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing substantial to merge with the main GTA article  Matt  (  Talk  )   08:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedically covered. Note that prior to my vote, someone removed the actual content from the article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete it with a rocket launcher. Marasmusine (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Conceivably fixable, but not worth the trouble. DGG (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is an explanation even really required for this one? --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 23:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.