Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Revenge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Revenge

 * — (View AfD)

Delete I've searched around for information on this subject, and I've found none. If it's true, perhaps a source should be found BishopTutu 21:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as complete nonsense. I've searched for a little while and found absolutely nothing regarding a game called Liberty City Revenge. Cheers, Lankybugger 22:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax. 'Nuff said. -- Kicking222 23:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete As hoax, "Liberty City Revenge" weighs in with a whopping 0 google hits . Reads like someone's taken the characters of GTA 3 and changed the gang status slightly. Chances of a genuine GTA game receiving no hits are about the same as Jesus suddenly appearing at the Eiffel Tower and handing out ice creams and nobody reporting on it. QuagmireDog 23:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That's a shame... I was hoping for a new GTA to keep me appetized until GTA IV later this year, and it so happens that I sw Jesus at the Eiffel Tower last week. Unfortunately, he was handing out Sno-cones, so I guess Liberty City Revenge isn't going to happen. -- Kicking222 00:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Hoax, no such game exists or been announced. TJ Spyke 00:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicious, which is unfortunately not speedy criteria. JuJube 01:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete; Hoax --Mhking 02:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax isn't a speedy criteria, but I don't mind. This page will go away soon enough. Quack 688 11:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax and/or wishful thinking. Move to BJAODN and let this die. --SunStar Nettalk 18:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.