Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Theft Auto: London Hijack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was snowball delete as obvious hoax. JDoorj a m    Talk 22:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: London Hijack
Article fails WP:N, WP:VAIN, and crystal ball. Tried speedy, tried prod, now this. Creator and only other editor (who may be the same person?) are involved with the film. -Merope 18:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sweet sassy molassy, delete Can this be speedied somehow? The article doesn't currently have any info besides cast and crew, but could any info possibly make this notable? FYI, the article's author removed the AfD tag, which I replaced. -- Kicking222 19:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The author has thrice removed the AfD tag and has been warned about it. -Merope 19:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, but I'm impressed that they're going to make a 90 minute movie shooting in Colorado and Hawaii with a budget of $100 :). Mark Grant 19:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As per the articles talk page it hasnt even begun filming yet and has no notable actors associated with the project. DrunkenSmurf 19:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, mainly for WP:VAIN but also for cretinism. The writer of the article and presumably of the film itself cannot even spell the word "writer". It has one T. The film is set in London in 1969 and involves three competing mafia gangs? In London? In 1969? -Ashley Pomeroy 21:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete nothing left now but the infobox. --DarkAudit 22:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.