Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandadbob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 02:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Grandadbob

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't find any evidence that they pass WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 04:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - looks like I need to get better at finding music sources, and I'm happy that the citations added support their notability. I'm glad that the nomination at least brought some attention to an article that needed it, if nothing else. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 02:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 04:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Leaning Keep on this one as there is evidence of meeting WP:NMUSIC, including: secondary album reviews in allmusic, Resident Advisor, and musicOMH, an allmusic staff bio, charting evidence from the Official Charts Company, and significant coverage on national radio BBC Radio 6. WP:V citations have been added to the article for all of these. ResonantDistortion 13:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.