Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandiloquence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to grandiloquence. No prejudice against content merge.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 20:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Grandiloquence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTDIC asilvering (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Transwiki the useful content from this article to Wiktionary, and then either delete or soft-redirect. jp×g 14:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Verbosity. Merge if warranted, but the content seems to be just two dictionary links and several examples, which may not be. Cnilep (talk) 07:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would also support soft-redirecting to wiktionary as an alternative, but not redirecting to Verbosity. Contrary to the text of that article's intro, the two terms are not synonyms. Colin M (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.