Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Butler Coomber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 20:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Grant Butler Coomber

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Concerned that it does not assert notability. "won PR awards for its media relations" is a bit ambiguous, and the rest of it hints at advertisement. SGGH ping! 15:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: note WP:COI for article's creator. MuffledThud (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep – Added support for award and cleaned up article; however, I am concerned the article is too much like an advertisement.  ttonyb (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, still fits the typical spam profile, a an international boutique Public Relations agency that specialises in technology and the environment ... (m)arkets include security, mobile and wireless, storage, IT hardware and software. Unlikely that this business will ever become a household name. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Though Ihcoyc is correct in saying that it is unlikely they will become a household name they do appear to fall weakly within notability guidelines. Article needs serious attention from a non-CoI editor. Simonm223 (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The offered references seem to be entirely press releases, and are moreover routine announcements that the business has been retained by one firm or another.  Even my weak German can figure out the gist of Pressemitteilung. And neither "silicon.com" nor "sys-net.com" would appear to be sites with anything other than "limited interest and circulation", not widely read outside the field. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  21:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Non-notable and self-advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snorre (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: spam article written by User:Grandbutlercoomber, who chose to focus on awards and list of clients. Alexius08 (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Note also that the creator's account was blocked indefinitely for spamusername on the day the article was created.  MuffledThud (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam which goes against WP:PROMOTION.  Them From  Space  00:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.