Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphene Flagship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Graphene Flagship

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I'm not sure this has any notability independently of Graphene, the substance. Almost all the references are first party  DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep it needs better citations, but this is a MASSIVE project, and even with the sources already present I think it meets GNG. There was a recent article in Physics Today, which I'll see if I can dig up. PianoDan (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Found and added. PianoDan (talk) 16:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep at least for now. I have been approached (out of the blue) by someone involved with the project, who has offered to improve sourcing. I will ask them to post on the article's talk page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Links now on talk page. GNG seems to be easily met. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.