Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravewalkaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted - no claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft 21:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Gravewalkaz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason This appears to be entirely fictious creation and as of this writing has not one wiki-link. If it was indeed a legitimate hoax, it certainly doesn't rise to the level of being notable beyond those who invented (ie, no ext links to mentions of said hoax) RoyBatty42 18:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if the band exists, the article admits that they've never been signed by a major record label, and there are no independent sources to demonstrate notability per WP:BAND. In fact, might even be speedy delete under A7, as I can't see that the article asserts notability at all. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  19:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy under A7 (no assertion of notability) using .  Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  20:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.