Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravitophonon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 21:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Gravitophonon
Per the arguments given at Articles for deletion/Boris Volfson

Pjacobi 21:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * My faeries have a better chance of being proven correct. Delete.  --humblefool&reg; 22:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * They're at the bottom of my garden right at this moment. Delete per reasons given at Articles for deletion/Phonon Maser. Tonywalton | Talk 14:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Phonon Maser; walled garden anyone ? Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Articles for deletion/Phonon Maser; Ricp31 03:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Phonon Maser and Articles for deletion/Boris Volfson. Michaelbusch 07:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep • See my comments to the Articles_for_deletion/Boris_Volfson. Volfson,boris
 * 'Delete Non-notable, complete bollocks, and lacking independent sources.  (The discussion page of a patent application!?) HEL 19:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.