Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrayMatter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

GrayMatter

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Possibly a non-notable company/organization. I will do this for now rather than having the article speedy deleted. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 04:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly? Anything is possibly non-notable. This nonprofit has raised several thousands of dollars and has a very respectable advisory board. It is an up and coming tool for students in need, especially those in New York City. visit its website graymatterfdn.org and you'll see it is notable indeed. 68.174.254.72 (talk) 04:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)68.174.254.72
 * See sockpuppet case and block, which appears to be Andsoad182. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non notable. I nominated this for speedy deletion, as a worthy student organization with no objective reliable sources supporting notability. Wikipedia is not a service for posting 'up and coming' entities, nor is it a directory for good causes. 99.189.155.209 (talk) 10:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

An objective source I found via google: http://stuyspectator.com/2011/02/15/with-graymatter-students-fund-student-matters/ I'm sure there are more Andsoad182 (talk) 16:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)andsoad182
 * The !vote by Andsoad182 does not count until we verify he is not using 68.174.254.72 as a sockpuppet (to double !vote). Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 01:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes and no. Having once edited one, I note with regret that high school newspapers are not considered as reliable sources as are professional publications. Rather than claiming there are more, it's necessary to actually find them; the Google search links at the top of this page yield little. 99.189.155.209 (talk) 21:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Just delete the page... Andsoad182 (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)andsoad182  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Only discussed by SPS. The references to CNN and NYT articles don't mention the organization. Chester Markel (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Andsoad182 (talk) 02:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.