Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grayson Walker

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete --cesarb 14:24, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Grayson Walker
Vanity page created by User:Agwiii, a User:RexJudicata sockpuppet, about himself. this person is utterly unnotable, and should be deleted for that reason SqueakBox 20:52, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parents Without Rights. He's not utterly nonnotable, but he isn't notable enough to get his own article. --Angr/undefined 05:56, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 09:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy any article in the main namespace created by its subject. If someone is truly notable, let someone else create an article. Jonathunder 18:30, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, per above. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''' This is simply more cyberharassment by SqueakBox who is on a vendetta. Don't be fooled by him and led into his vendetta. He continues to make false claims and spreads lies after being told by an International Anti-Harassment organization that he is a Cyber Stalker and Harasser. Rex Judicata 12:51, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Retain Ignore this VFD because it is based upon the personal vendetta of SqueakBox. I am Rex Judicata and I am not Agwiii. This is just one of the lies being spread by SqueakBox about me. He is a Wikipedia pest and troll. The rule is, "don't feed the trolls." Furthermore, I am a member of Parents Without Rights and have met Dr. Walker. I suggest before you decide that his work for children and families in America is not "notable," you should visit the Parents Without Rights website at www.ParentsWithoutRights.org and join the discussion group on Yahoogroups. If you base your decision upon facts and not the harassment of SqueakBox, you'll see through SqueakBox and leave this page alone. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by RexJudicata (talk • contribs) 13:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This Vfd should have been terminated a week ago, please do so now, SqueakBox 13:33, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Cyberstalking, Harassment, & Dog Posting by SqueakBox
SqueakBox follows me around Wikipedia and vandalizes anything I touch. He tells the lie that I, Rex Judicata, am also Agwiii and has posted this lie in several places. I simply delete the lie. However, the very nature of Wikipedia encourages the behavior of people like SqueakBox. He claims to be a deletionist, but is actually an obsessionist and Cyberstalker.

Law enforcement on the Internet is a challenge for all countries, but we have seen some dramatic events with creators of denial of service, virus, spam, etc. being brought to justice. I am a resident of Florida, and have been an Internet Safety Activist for years.

I have worked to help the passage of Florida 2003 Cyberstalking Law. Those administrators who believe in Wikipedia should question why behavior that is outlawed by Florida (and many other states and countries) would be condoned by Wikipedia. I suggest that this is the case - that Wikipedia allows cyberstalking, harassment and dog posting -- and that it is time for Wikipedia to change.

Questions and comments? Email me at RexJudicata@gmail.com

Signed proudly and accurately by Rex Judicata 13:29, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)


 * Yoyu are not allowed to delete accusations of sockpuppetry against yourself. It was anopther use, not me, who first reached that conclusion, SqueakBox 13:43, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Deleting comments from Vfd, as you have just done RexJudicata, is considered vandalism and may result in your being blocked, SqueakBox 14:18, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.