Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grayson mcgregor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Grayson mcgregor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fictional character that does not meet notability requirements of WP:FICT Pilotbob 13:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Pilotbob 13:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable character from a book "published" by a print-on-demand vanity publisher. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As above. No reason to keep this page at all.Alberon 15:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom 15:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FICT. -- Mikeblas 18:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, entirely non-notable. Utterly fails secondary source requirement of WP:FICT. Google returns 2 hits with "-wikipedia", neither of which are related to the topic making any chance of establishing notability extremely doubtful. Doctorfluffy 19:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability. 17:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridernyc (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, per everything said above. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The book, author, and publisher are red links, how can the character be notable? Edward321 20:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.