Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grazmach Tameru Lemma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see a consensus to draftify. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Grazmach Tameru Lemma

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Zero sources about subject in article. Zero Google hits, apart from the article itself. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Girth Summit  (blether) 06:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Girth Summit  (blether)  06:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  Girth Summit  (blether)  06:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions.  Girth Summit  (blether)  06:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. The "Tameru Lemma" in this reference may refer to the same person, but locating a copy of the book may be difficult. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:BASIC. Also creator has a serious WP:OWN issue that may mean this should be WP:SALTed. Mztourist (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No citations Qxrz (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No citations. I can't even find anything for WP:V.  Pepper Beast    (talk)  20:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BASIC. Intothatdarkness 00:12, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. See talk page where original editor acknowledges that the subject fails WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 14:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete  Per above and it can be recreated if the editor finds new sources that covers the Article's Notability.--—— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to draftspace. As mentioned above, without any sources or verifiability it should not be published on WP. However, if the author's claims are true that he held the claimed position, that could be notable. I think placing it in draft space would give the author a chance to provide verifiable references. Jamesallain85 (talk) 22:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G5 - Created 2 September 2021‎ by TRUTHINCommons, a confirmed sock of LEKReports (blocked 19 August 2021). Эlcobbola  talk 20:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete disagree with draftifying (which misuses the AfC process; one possible fleeting reference, nothing suggests passing even the most generous of notability criteria. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.