Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grease 2 (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Jenks24 (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Grease 2 (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability beyond being the soundtrack to a "film". Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Laun chba  ller  16:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable: the soundtrack does not inherit notability from the film.  Arfæst Ealdwrítere   (talk)  16:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - No evidence of any notability. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've added some more material with a couple of sources. I don't know if the album passes WP:NALBUMS, but I figure it's worth a try. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, it seems to have charted, but still, do we need a standalone article?-- Laun  chba  ller  08:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * As a second choice, either merge or redirect to Grease 2 per Gongshow. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Metropolitan90's additions. The reviews at Allmusic and Billboard, along with the chart placements for the album and lead single, suggest sufficient notability per WP:NALBUMS so I'm inclined to support an article. Perhaps this material can be contained (merged) within the movie article; either option is preferable to deletion.  Gongshow   talk  07:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Major label release, frequently reviewed, made the Billboard charts... We have a pretty low notability standard for inclusion of pop culture topics and little taste for chopping such things at AfD for good reason — this is the sort of stuff that a section of our readers expect of us. Let's just call it a GNG pass or a No Consensus keep and move along, shall we? Carrite (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep major-label charting album. Not nearly the chart-topping success as the first one, but still clears the bar.  Carrite is correct, we have a pretty low inclusion standard for albums, for good reason. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.