Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Car Burn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. per WP:SNOW and WP:CSD blatant hoax - there is absolutely no news confirmation, and the image camera data shows that the photo was taken five years ago. JohnCD (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Great Car Burn

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Either a hoax, or just not notable, as I can find nothing whatsoever in the news or elsewhere about this purported event. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOTNEWS at best. No sources or evidence of being an encyclopedically notable event. 88.112.56.9 (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Polarpanda (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete hilarious article, but sadly delete. No notability at all.  Definitely award the article creator for a sense of humour though DRosin (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax. There is no way that this event would have gone unnoticed or uncriticized. I can't even find mention of it in blogs. The photo is dated to Dec 29th, 2004. Abductive  (reasoning) 14:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 21:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Question I also think it is a hoax, but even so, why would you put a speedy tag on an article already running an AfD course?--Sky Attacker   the legend reborn...  04:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * One answer would be to speed up and free resources (people's time) for something more important than a snowball case. -- Alexf(talk) 15:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 15:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.