Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Junction Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 20:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Great Junction Street

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be an average city street; not notable. Nyttend (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 20:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Coverage here: Polarpanda (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless substantially expanded in Afd period. The street appears to be the start of the A901 road, but its article A901 road (Great Britain) is only a mere redirect to a list.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Appears to be an average drive-by nomination made without following the due diligence of our deletion process. I have expanded the article by reference to some of the numerous sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Kindly assume good faith on the part of the nominator. Nyttend (talk) 04:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep "The street was the site of a triumphal arch which was constructed for the reception of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert in 1842." Google Book search for it and "triumphal arch" reveals some notable mention of it for that prominent feature.   D r e a m Focus  13:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Reasonably detailed article with ample room for expansion. I added an image, but more are available. --DThomsen8 (talk) 03:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reasonable road article with historical context adding notability. -- Banj e  b oi   07:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.