Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Lakes Inline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. The nominator has withdrew their nomination. (non-admin closure) TBrandley (what's up) 19:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Great Lakes Inline

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unref article, tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep – I was able to find coverage in Hockey Weekly; perhaps some other editors who are more familiar with this sport might also have some knowledge of where to look for sources. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * weak Keep (weak keep as I am unsure if the refs are substantial & what the standards ought to be in this sport) The nominator had apparently not checked, or perhaps not checked carefully enough, but there are references. Large scale nominations of disparate articles always suggest the nom is not working carefully. (See below, where a obvious copyvio was missed in the checking)  DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 09:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.