Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Outdoors Group Fitness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Great Outdoors Group Fitness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Newly founded local company that, from what I see with my searches, hasn't gotten much third-party coverage and, even if there was the slightest, I doubt there would be enough for local notability. Notifying taggers. SwisterTwister  talk  21:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I originally came across this when it was a userspace draft directly moved (without review) into article space without the userspace draft tag being removed. I think I became aware of it as a result of the author asking for help on how to remove it from either the RefDesk or the IRC help channel (I can't remember anymore). Either way, I couldn't find evidence of notability earlier, and I still can't find evidence of notability now. The company may not even exist anymore (if it ever did). -- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  06:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I would have used A7 and probably G11 on this one: "and has begun an advertising campaign within Lancaster as of early 2011." "The group was recently covered in the business section of the Lancaster Guardian[2] detailing its goals and noted that two locations in Lancaster were currently in use."  DGG ( talk ) 18:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.