Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Steak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kahala Brands. The 50* IP's efforts are appreciated, but there isn't quite enough to demonstrate enough potential notability to run this for another week. That said, I've taken the found references and merged them into the target article's line on the subject. If anybody would like for this to be restored to their userspace to work on and find additional refs for, please ping me and I'll fix it up for you. The Bushranger One ping only 02:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Great Steak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Typical business and the typical press releases and notices, a redirect here is reasonable but can also be dealt with by both deletion and redirect, given the promotionalism. The first source is literally a business listing and the second is their own website. An immediate search here shows there's no actual substantial coverage as needed for a relevant article and there's in fact extremely vague claims of significance. SwisterTwister  talk  02:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kahala_Brands where the subject is mentioned, as an alternative to deletion. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. A plausible search term, but not independently notable for a stand-alone article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no content here, and there is seems to be nothing to be found except notices.  As the trade name is the deliberate use of a common phrase for advertising purposes, I'm not even sure about the redirect.  DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Before a decision is made to kill this article, please take a look at my rather meager attempt of adding content to this article that is not solely based upon material from the company's PR department. There are some fragmentary material in the Cincinnati newspapers about the company before it was acquired by Kahana. I believed that this article has more potential than Articles for deletion/Sarku Japan and there should be an attempt to save the article before a decision is made for deletion.  -- 50.195.200.161 (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.