Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Eston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. The article has been reverted to a version prior to the promotional copyright violation. Thryduulf (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Greater Eston

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

'Greater Eston' isn't a place as such, but seems to be a neologism. I'm not sure if it's notable (despite many Google hits) or encyclopedic (this isn't actually a place; just a term). Thoughts? Computerjoe 's talk 21:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delisted. Not Cleveland, Ohio but Cleveland, England. Computerjoe 's talk 11:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete without prejudice G11. This article is unambiguous promotion, however from looking at google results it is possible that Greater Eston might be notable as a region within the Redcar and Cleveland unitary authority area. Any encyclopaedic article will be better created from scratch though. Thryduulf (talk) 23:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the current referenced, non-copyrighted, non-promotional version. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Thryduulf (talk) 23:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but reduce to stub if necessary to get rid of the promotion . The Borough of Redcar and Cleveland is an odd setup, which includes many standalone settlements in the east of the borough, and a good chuck of the eastern part of the Middlesbrough conurbation in the Western part of the borough. Having lived in the borough myself, I can see the sense in referring to the latter half as "Greater Eston". Normally, I would go for delete anyway, because you can't put an article for a term in Wikipedia just because it should exist. However, as this term is being used by the local authority that covers this area, that counts as a reliable source, therefore the article should stay, just not necessarily in its current form. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as reverted version, below. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but revert to e.g. version 295458018 as edited by Keith D on 9 June.73 hits on Google News archive seem to indicate enough notability. The later version due to is a WP:copyright violation of this page from Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council. Qwfp (talk) 09:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Reverted to avoid a copyvio. Computerjoe 's talk 10:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn No opposition now; so please speedy close this as keep Computerjoe 's talk 16:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.