Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Victoria Film Commission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or merge to BC Film Commission. Seems like a non-controversial merge with no further need of debate. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Greater Victoria Film Commission

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company promotion for a company that in the light of its business (film-industry) is not very often mentioned on the internet (7710 hits). It does not look very notable. Night of the Big Wind talk  21:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The two newspaper articles cited as references are local, but the organization seems to play a significant role in the Canadian film industry. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable to Canada film is fine with en.Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge & Redir to BC Film Commission to whom they are (IMO) a local branch of. This 'Branch' could not operate without the assistance of the Parent organization. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 07:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * A merge and redirect to the parent organization is fine with me.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.