Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Politacle Gaffs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Greatest political gaffes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Original research since claim of "greatest gaff[e]s" is unreferenced. Poorly cited article, collection of random quotes. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 13:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Well perhaps greatest was wrong on the article title, i a, however quite happy to a name change to political gaffs? Of course such an article would be a random collection of quotes. I had not finished the article when it was nominated for deletion :) hence no links to said quotes. Is there a rule in wp which forbids a collection of gaff`s made by politicans? --mark nutley (talk) 13:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * One other thing, should i hold off on any further work on this article until such a time as it has been decided if in is in or out? mark nutley (talk) 13:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment You are free to make improvements to the article, even while its under AfD consideration. Digestible (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, inherently subjective list (who decides what's "greatest", horribly misspelled title. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Terrible article. Quotes are not sourced, possibly fictional. Even if verifiable, this stuff is way too trivial for a standalone article. If a politician is especially known for his boneheaded comments then they should be included in the biographical article. Digestible (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I had considered whether there would be room for a similar article called Political Gaffes but any such list is bound to be inherently subjective original research. Maybe try WikiQuote or a similar site for your article WWGB mark nutley? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not my article! I am the nominator ... WWGB (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies, had my christmas head on! Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. This can never be anything but a subjective list of quotes, even if sources were provided for each one.  Who gets to decide which is "greatest"?  The horribly spelled title only makes it that much worse. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  14:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As either "Greatest Political Gaffs" or simply "Political gaffs", the article is a pointless piece of listcruff which would become noting but a POV repository. The attribution of any particular quote to this category without proper citations could even amount to libel.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and a WP:BLP and WP:NPOV violation. I recognize some of the quotes in this article as being inaccurately attributed (i.e. they were not spoken by the person they are ascribed to in this article). I would also note the hubris involved in writing an article about political gaffes and misspelling the title, although that is not itself a reason for deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced, although it's probably from an amusing webpage of some sort rather than . It's interesting that some of the quotes that were attributed to Dan Quayle 20 years ago (the one about bondage, the one about Mars, and the misquote of "a mind is a terrible thing to waste") are now being attributed to Al Gore.  Yeah, we get it, you hate Al Gore, Gore sucks, etc., now find a reliable source that links a stupid statement to a particular person. Mandsford (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as highly inaccurate attack page full of original research and empty of attribution. Funny thing: Youtube actually has videos of those alleged Al Gore quotes, but most were said by Dan Quayle back in the 1990s. --NellieBly (talk) 02:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Well as the majority are on delete i figure i`ll not object :) mark nutley (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * delete OR and completely subject to any given editors POV.·Maunus· ƛ · 08:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete This article is libelous toward a living person, Al Gore, since he did not say ANY of the foolish things attributed to him on this list. --MelanieN (talk) 05:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.