Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Times of All


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete and redirect to Jason McCoy. -- jonny - m t  05:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Greatest Times of All

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutely no info on this album online. 8 hits on Google, no All Music Guide listing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - I have never heard of the singer Jason McCoy but he looks notable enough to warrant a bio. But then it is odd that his first album does not carry enough notability. -- GarbageCollection - !Collect 17:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Because the album was released on a small indie label, and it wasn't reviewed, and it didn't produce any singles. Notable artist doesn't translate to notable album 100% of the time. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The album produced three singles, and two of them charted on the Canadian country singles chart in 1989. Eric444 (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'll vote keep if you can provide a source for those charting achievements. Wolfer68 (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although the artist's notability seems to have begun in 1995 with being signed to a major label, being a debut album by a Canadian country star that does contain a song that charted makes it worth keeping. Wolfer68 (talk) 23:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment The three sources are fansites (one, being on Geocities, is especially verboten), and the third is an issue of RPM. Even if it did produce chart singles, the album is not the subject of any reliable third-party sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Greeves (talk • contribs) 14:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - per above. No indication of notability. Redirect at worst. Renata (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete then redirect; no convincing evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC and no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Smile a While (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.