Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greco-Welsh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 22:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Greco-Welsh

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It is a topic that Google can find, but only 13 results, none of which appear at first glance to be reliable sources for the term, some of which are simply juxtaposition of Greco and Welsh. This looks like a non notable neologism. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm about ready for someone to declare it S.O.P. to delete this type of random combination lacking persuasive evidence of notability (as in African-American). JJL (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete another non-notable intersection of ethnic groups. This one qualifies deletion as a WP:DICDEF. Tavix (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Good grief! Delete of course. PatGallacher (talk) 01:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tavix's response. It's just a definition of a small group. FaerieInGrey (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Besides what others have said, the article is just about the expression, not about the people. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unlikely to be more than a dicdef and a list of NN people. Bearian (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow--delete. Is this even a group? Drmies (talk) 18:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It has very little content and doesn't assert notability to the topic. Da boch to this article, then. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 03:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I never liked their records.Red Hurley (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a very big can of worms to be opening for something non-notable. -- billinghurst (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.