Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece–Venezuela relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Greece–Venezuela relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent sources provide significant coverage of this relationship. The one salient fact, the presence of embassies, is already recorded at Diplomatic missions of Greece and of Venezuela. Biruitorul Talk 06:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete minor bilateral agreements and minor level of trade as per LibStar (talk) 07:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of why this is a notable topic, nothing to back it up with. Fails WP:N miserably.-- Blue Squadron  Raven  22:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. We are an almanac-like reference work, and this is an almanac entry. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * this seems like a WP:USEFUL argument. see WP:NOT as well. LibStar (talk) 04:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin this user has posted almost identical comments at other AFDs including, ,    , . LibStar (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And what is wrong with that? Biruitorul, LibStar, and BlueSquadronRaven all vote in lockstep. Why is my information less valid because I am consistent with it? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * well I know at least Biruitorul and I never use the same text on every single AfD and almost always provide reasons. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Richard, I, for one, will not be debating the merits of your argument any further. Any closing admin with a brain in his head will see that your non-sequitor of a rationale for keeping this article doesn't address any concerns about its lack of notability, nor any other failings of it compared to any other policy or guideline. You can call wikipedia William Shatner's toupee from now on, for all I care, it won't change it. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  03:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Yannismarou (talk) 23:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an iota of notability. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 12:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep Subject is notable, like most articles just needs expansion. Clear notable economic relations a quick google check informs me. Dr. Blofeld (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. PLEASE HELP US Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this unsourced stub. I can find no reliable sources that discuss this relationship in any depth on my own.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is but it's not independent. There's just not enough material for an article in its own right.  HJMitchell    You rang?  13:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.