Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek-Mongolian relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Foreign relations of Mongolia. Overly, consensus was to delete, but as Foreign relations of Mongolia now hold the content what I've done is delete and place a redirect. Nja 247 10:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Greek-Mongolian relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. Google news search shows up hardly anything, only relations seem to be in a multilateral sense ie Mongolia-Europe. Mongolian Foreign ministry site says very little on Greece. LibStar (talk) 07:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not establish notability. PMK1 (talk) 11:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. Thanks. I requested that the AFDs end so we could work together please Ikip (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What a great idea-- tell everyone that you think their opinions are irrelevant, and then say "let's all work together". Mandsford (talk) 22:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - random pairing that fails WP:N through lack of sources. - Biruitorul Talk 15:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A Google news search turned up | almost nothing and |practically nothing. But of course, that isn't relevant.  Mandsford (talk) 22:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Making new articles instead of the bilateral random stubs does not reduce the argument to delete them -- in fact it seems a strong argument to delete them in itself. Thanks -- I suggest that these be handled expeditiously now.  All other than obvious real ones. Collect (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - a soup bowl of nonsense. Nothing notable here, utterly random pairing. Dahn (talk) 00:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable about this combination. They don't even have embassies or consulates in each other's country. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 01:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notabilty has not been established. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 02:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Foreign relations of Greece by country and Foreign relations of Mongolia by country. 203 article are better than circa 20,000 articles. See Foreign relations of Argentina by country for an example. Edison (talk) 03:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, circa 37,000. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 09:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * An even better idea would be to merge "Greek-Mongolian relations" and all the others to Foreign relations of Argentina. One big article would be better than 203.  Mandsford (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete article does not, and probably cannot, establish notability of the stated article topic through sources. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Mongolia, which now holds the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.