Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek Island Hopping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Move To Draft. Do not recreate unlessits well sourced'''. Spartaz Humbug! 10:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Greek Island Hopping

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE ! dave  23:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  02:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  02:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-encyclopedic entry. Would belong in some other article. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write)  02:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research and fails WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTTRAVEL. Ajf773 (talk) 02:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT a travel guide, see WikiVoyage; it also appears to be an attempt to coin a phrase. Atsme 📞📧 14:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is a non-referenced article, which, as Atsme points out, appears to be an attempt to coin a phrase. Attempts at phrase coining such as this do not belong in Wikipedia. Vorbee (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The phrase already exists: Anthony Horowitz: modern-day island-hopping in Greece (The Telegraph); Greek island hopping - where to start? (tripadvisor) etc. ——Chalk19 (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NOT a travel guide is the reason to delete the article. I will clarify further in my reason above. Atsme 📞📧 13:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment This is a real thing similar to Articles_for_deletion/Blue_Cruise - I don't really think it meets Not Travel - it doesn't have any phone numbers, hotels, restaurant information, etc. But it's completely unreferenced and most of the sources I've found by searching quickly are not going to establish notability. Reluctant to vote delete as the sources likely do exist, likewise reluctant to vote keep based on sources I haven't seen Seraphim System  ( talk ) 13:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep if not copyvio. Draftify not advertising,the term seems used in a variety or sources, and if it's copyvio we haven't found it. As a type of tour, this seems to be the common came--searching Google for "greek island tour"  shows that more than half the hits use the term.  The style is `nec. but fixable. What's needed is further check for copyvio  DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Checked for copyvio via Earwig. Came back negative. ! dave  10:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * that may not be enough in this case, because of the way it reads. Tere are two many possibilties for printed sources. If we keep it, the safest thing to do is to rewrite it a little to rephrase the parts that are most different from our usual style . So I'm saying Draftify.  DGG ( talk ) 16:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Good point and I know what you mean. Upon first sight of this article my 'spidey sense' thought copyvio, and I was surprised when earwig came back negative. ! dave  17:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per DGG. ——Chalk19 (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.