Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek Life at the University of Missouri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. keepers provide no policy based reasoning here. Secret account 03:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Greek Life at the University of Missouri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a random collection of unencyclopedic hyper-local club activity regarding 22% of the population at one mid-west American university. Toddst1 (talk) 21:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 22:32, 12 March 201 (UTC)
 * Keep unless articles of a similar nature are also being removed, such as East Carolina University Greek life, Clemson University Greek life, or Greek life at the University of Georgia
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You understand WP:OSE says your argument means Delete, right? Toddst1 (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. You attempt to minimize the importance of the subject, but the fact remains that this is one that is quite significant to MU. There are a plethora of sources evidencing the impact this sector has on the University. It belongs entirely, it just may need some trimming. Ducknish (talk) 01:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Right. Hyperlocal importance.  See WP:NOT. Toddst1 (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. Hyperlocal/guidebook. DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well referenced, may need more organization (the list of GLOs map belong on top).Naraht (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - could be better organized, but has encyclopedic value. Uberaccount (talk) 03:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete; yeah...it may be "well referenced" - that doesn't inherently lead to notability. "Encyclopedic value"? How so? WP:NOT says...not. As per nom: "a random collection of unencyclopedic hyper-local club activity regarding 22% of the population at one mid-west American university." — Theopolisme   ( talk )  22:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.