Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek Women's Engineering Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The arguments for deletion outweight the arugment for retention here; nothing has come forward to rebut the article's lack of notability via sourcing. –MuZemike 17:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Greek Women's Engineering Association

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable organisation. Contested PROD. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

 Thank you for your comments. You are right. Article missed external references. I added more references (sites of european organizations Greek Women's Engineering Assotiations belongs: European Platform of Women Scientists- EPWS, Women in Science, Engineering & Technology-WiTEC, European Federation of Mentoring for girls & Women -WOMENTOR). I got inspired to create this article because I read the wikipedia article abour Royal Institute of British Architects and as President of the Greek Women's Association I though that was a good idea to create an article for our association too. Our Association is not settled in UK and our members are Greek women engineers but someone may search for us and our actions via wikipedia.Please note down that there is no wikipedia in Greek (it is in primary level). So pleae reconsider your decision to delete this article. BettyRouni (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC). I have copied the above text from the talk page. Biscuittin (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have expanded the article and tidied up the references. Biscuittin (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – Does not pass WP:GNG (substantial coverage from multiple reliable sources), let alone WP:ORG/WP:CORPDEPTH. JFHJr (㊟) 05:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There is not likely to be "substantial coverage from multiple reliable sources" (in English) about a Greek association. I'd have thought some flexibility could be shown in this case. Biscuittin (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sources do not have to be in English, nor even online - they just have to exist, and be verifiable, if need be by getting someone to drop into the library in Athens.Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.