Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek thought

Greek thought
Re: Greek thought -- to match the Hebrew thought nomination above

Non-encyclopedic. Nonsense. Personal essay. Original research.


 * Details of the flaws of the Hebrew thought and Greek thought pages covered in fine detail in Talk:Hebrew thought. This page as it is now does not represent the views of even one published author. ---Rednblu 20:08, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Again, nothing wrong with the title as such, which could be an enlightening and encyclopaedic article some day, it is the article itself that doesn't make the grade. In it we have opinion, opinion and more opinion masquerading as documentation. Delete. Fire Star 20:17, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * As above, an attempt to rescue these by moving would be ok, but any move that's appropriate would make them un-findable. Both articles are POV, although educated.  Delete. Geogre 20:30, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Junk Science, POV --Improv 22:20, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh man, delete and then create as redirect to Greek philosophy.--Samuel J. Howard 02:31, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge into a Hebraism and Hellenism article along with Hebrew thought. It's a valid comparison, historically notable. The current article is an essay, though. The merged text should make reference to the comparison as a historical phenomenon. Wile E. Heresiarch 02:33, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reasons mostly the same as given above under Hebrew Thought discussion. I have no problem with Wile E. Heresiarch either now or at any time producing a good article summarizing and explaining what people have thought about the differences between Greek perceptions and Hebrew perceptions. Good idea. If some of this material is of value, a merge to a new Hebraism and Hellenism article to be placed immediately on cleanup would be appropriate. Jallan 16:24, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete  – Quadell (talk) (help)   04:16, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)