Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green-eyed Flamingo

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy delete. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:32, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Green-eyed Flamingo
Nearly speedied this but I wasn't quite sure. Seems like a limp joke. No hits on Google for green eyed flamingo. --Lee Hunter 03:07, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is self-contradictory.  non-sense.  RJFJR 03:46, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Joke/hoax. Kappa 05:22, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, Obvious hoax. Inter 10:27, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree with Inter. Speedy delete. Mgm|(talk) 14:40, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above. HyperZonk 22:44, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It's had its fifteen minutes of undeserved fame. Denni &#9775; 00:23, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speedy to make it go faster, reflects poorly on this project.  hydnjo talk 00:44, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax/ bad joke. --Idont Havaname 00:58, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Another vote for speedy delete. The author has continued making unhelpful edits, and just created the irritatingly useless dog names. -- Hadal 17:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. Norman Rogers\talk 00:06, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 03:18, Feb 14, 2005 Jpgordon deleted Green-eyed Flamingo (Hoax, nonsense) &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:32, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.